WEBVTT
00:00:23.579 --> 00:00:25.579
Hi Warriors and welcome to One in Three.
00:00:25.660 --> 00:00:26.859
I'm your host, Ingrid.
00:00:27.500 --> 00:00:33.420
Today is October 1st and marks the official start of Domestic Violence Awareness Month.
00:00:33.659 --> 00:00:40.859
This year's theme, as shared by the Domestic Violence Awareness Project, is With Survivors Always.
00:00:41.100 --> 00:00:45.340
It's a powerful reminder that survivors deserve safety.
00:00:45.579 --> 00:00:47.739
Survivors deserve support.
00:00:48.060 --> 00:00:51.019
And survivors deserve solidarity.
00:00:51.260 --> 00:01:01.020
I am honored to be joined today by Captain Eric Thrillkeld, who has dedicated much of his career to advocating for domestic violence victims.
00:01:01.340 --> 00:01:02.700
Here's Eric.
00:01:03.259 --> 00:01:03.899
Hi, Eric.
00:01:04.060 --> 00:01:05.659
Thank you so much for joining me today.
00:01:06.060 --> 00:01:06.700
Of course.
00:01:07.579 --> 00:01:14.859
So before we get into our conversation, could you give a bit of a background of yourself so the listeners can get to know you a bit?
00:01:15.340 --> 00:01:15.819
Sure.
00:01:16.539 --> 00:01:20.460
So I've been in law enforcement for over 30 years.
00:01:21.020 --> 00:01:33.659
I started my career in New Mexico in a small city and that I actually, the same town I went to high school in, eventually worked my way up to Albuquerque, New Mexico, where I worked for several years with the police there.
00:01:34.219 --> 00:01:44.859
I spent several years in Colorado Springs with the El Paso County Sheriff's Office, which is kind of where I got my really strong interest in this topic of domestic violence.
00:01:45.099 --> 00:01:59.260
I had an opportunity to join a specialized team there called the Domestic Violence Enhanced Response Team, which was a multidisciplined group of people handling the most lethal cases in a two-county area.
00:01:59.739 --> 00:02:19.500
I took that experience and went overseas with the United Nations police in 2000 with uh in Kosovo and kind of parlayed that experience with domestic violence into what I was doing there, training police uh at the police academy in Kosovo.
00:02:19.579 --> 00:02:26.780
And then I I uh was the director or the chief of the domestic violence program for the country.
00:02:26.939 --> 00:02:37.740
Um the country was broken up into five regions, and we had international police in each region who and our goal, our world goal was to train local police officers to take over.
00:02:38.139 --> 00:02:59.979
And went from Kosovo to Macedonia, North Macedonia, with the organization for security and cooperation in Europe, uh, where I trained uh police leaders, community leaders uh on Western standards of modern policing, a lot on community policing-oriented projects and domestic violence training as well.
00:03:00.139 --> 00:03:08.620
Uh eventually came back to the United States, worked for the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center for a while, uh, again focusing on domestic violence.
00:03:08.780 --> 00:03:12.620
And now I've been with the Eddie County Sheriff's Office for about 14 years.
00:03:12.780 --> 00:03:25.819
Uh, started out in patrol and worked my way up to captain, all of which has been uh detective, patrol detective, sergeant, lieutenant, and captain all in the detective division.
00:03:26.139 --> 00:03:35.900
And we're an agency of about 80 sworn positions, and um I oversee, I'm still overseeing the detective division and um the divert program.
00:03:36.060 --> 00:03:39.580
I've created a helped to create a divert program here as well.
00:03:41.819 --> 00:03:55.500
So do all law offices have a domestic violence, like do they have domestic violence training as part of their system, or is that something that's specific and depends on how remote they are?
00:03:56.139 --> 00:04:05.259
So every academy has some domestic violence component to it, but it's it's woefully inadequate for doing thorough investigations.
00:04:05.500 --> 00:04:12.539
The average that I've seen around the country is about 16 hours of training for out of the whole academy.
00:04:12.780 --> 00:04:20.860
So it's it's imperative that agencies do more advanced training once officers get out of basic training, they start working in the field.
00:04:20.939 --> 00:04:26.860
And a lot of that comes through the the field training program of actually responding to calls.
00:04:26.939 --> 00:04:29.500
It's you know, trial by fire, if you will.
00:04:29.580 --> 00:04:35.100
Uh but I in my view, that really shouldn't be the case.
00:04:35.259 --> 00:04:46.779
We should be have really really well-rounded, well-trained officers uh before they actually go on the street and start responding to these calls for for various reasons.
00:04:46.939 --> 00:04:52.699
One, they're extremely dangerous to everybody involved, including the officers who are responding.
00:04:52.860 --> 00:05:14.139
Um, but it what your that initial response uh oftentimes makes or breaks if the case is going to be successful, if you're gonna save someone's life or not, uh, and and puts victims and and and offenders and children on the right or wrong path, depending on how you address it and at that from the very first call for service.
00:05:15.420 --> 00:05:26.379
So I'm actually I was planning on going in a different order, but uh, since you're talking about danger, a lot of people are talking about mass shootings, and that's always sort of on the top of everyone's brain.
00:05:26.779 --> 00:05:32.459
There's a strong link between a history of domestic violence uh and mass shootings.
00:05:32.540 --> 00:05:33.259
Is that correct?
00:05:33.899 --> 00:05:34.300
Sure.
00:05:34.459 --> 00:05:44.540
Um actually actually statistically, uh about over 50% of mass shootings that occurred in our country have a domestic violence nexus.
00:05:44.699 --> 00:06:03.899
Uh you can go back to most of them and find that your suspect is either as is either a domestic violence abuser that grew up in an abusive home and and witnessed a lot of domestic violence, um you you will see that uh it's a it's an ongoing theme.
00:06:04.139 --> 00:06:17.899
And if you go all the way back to the first recorded mass shooting that that we had in the United States, I believe it was 1966 at the University of Texas, uh, where the subject climbed up on a tower and started shooting students with a high-powered rifle.
00:06:18.139 --> 00:06:23.019
He killed his wife and and uh mother before coming to that that scene.
00:06:23.259 --> 00:06:26.300
So and there's plenty of other examples.
00:06:26.459 --> 00:06:31.980
Uh Dylan Roof uh witnessed years of abuse by his stepfather against his mother.
00:06:32.139 --> 00:06:40.139
Um you look at the Pulse Nightclub shooting, uh the offender in that, uh, the documented history of strangulation against his wife.
00:06:40.379 --> 00:06:42.620
So it there's plenty of evidence.
00:06:42.699 --> 00:07:06.139
Uh, and and one of the things I focus on in the training that we do with officers is if if you're be aware of that when you go into these situations, not only for mass shooting, but for suspects who strangle their their uh victims, officers are at a much higher increased risk of being hurt or killed by those suspects if they're stranglers.
00:07:07.019 --> 00:07:24.060
Yeah, I remember reading, and I don't know the exact uh statistics, that it was around 75 to 80 percent of officer um involved homicide where they were the the person who was killed um from a domestic violence offender who had previously strangled their intimate partner.
00:07:24.860 --> 00:07:29.579
Um so you had mentioned before multidisciplinary teams.
00:07:29.819 --> 00:07:31.660
What does that exactly mean?
00:07:32.540 --> 00:07:35.259
So it depends on on which context you look at it.
00:07:35.339 --> 00:07:56.139
Uh so you probably heard of the term um a CRC community response uh community response team, community, there's different acronyms for it, but which is sort of a multidisciplined group of people who get together on a regular basis and review sexual assault crimes and domestic violence-related crimes.
00:07:56.220 --> 00:07:59.339
Or maybe maybe they have separate teams and they have one for each issue.
00:07:59.420 --> 00:08:08.860
Uh, but you bring to the table uh the medical expertise, for example, probably have a medical doctor on that team, a prosecutor or two.
00:08:09.019 --> 00:08:28.139
Uh in best case scenarios, you'll have a judge or two, uh, you'll have law enforcement, you'll have um nonprofit victim advocates, for-profit, not for-profit, but uh victim advocates who are attached to law enforcement agencies or prosecution's prosecutors' offices, and uh probation and parole.
00:08:28.459 --> 00:08:39.740
Um anybody who has a hand in the in the making and dealing uh with domestic violence, offenders and victims in the community can be part of this group.
00:08:40.379 --> 00:08:45.500
And I've seen lots of different examples of how they how they function.
00:08:45.660 --> 00:08:53.660
Uh some of them can be very detail-oriented, some are looking at looking at things from a broader perspective.
00:08:54.059 --> 00:09:08.379
Um you you have some that um are doing case reviews and deciding as a group how they might best assist this the families or the people that are involved in these cases.
00:09:08.700 --> 00:09:11.259
They can be really effective.
00:09:11.500 --> 00:09:14.059
Um they're hard topic to hold together.
00:09:14.379 --> 00:09:18.700
Uh you've got to bring decision makers to the table in those things.
00:09:19.019 --> 00:09:26.059
Um, for example, uh a chief of police sending a patrol officer to those teams is it gonna be very effective?
00:09:26.460 --> 00:09:33.899
Because you've got to have somebody there when they're when they're talking about policy um changes, um, changes in protocols.
00:09:34.059 --> 00:09:37.179
It's gotta be somebody in position who can say, yes, we can do that.
00:09:37.419 --> 00:09:44.460
Um and it it's uh kind of like herding cats and getting all those people to the table on on a regular basis.
00:09:45.340 --> 00:09:54.779
And and it making those teams self-sustainable where it's not all contingent on the uh the coordinator uh to hold it all together.
00:09:54.940 --> 00:10:01.580
Um I've seen teams where a coordinator uh leaves for one reason or another and the the whole thing just kind of falls apart.
00:10:01.820 --> 00:10:08.539
But they could they can be set up and and programmed well and to to carry on no matter who's a uh who the coordinator is.
00:10:08.860 --> 00:10:10.700
And uh they're very effective.
00:10:10.860 --> 00:10:22.779
Yeah, uh another another form of a multidiscipline approach is a specialized domestic violence unit uh like would be most likely within a police organization.
00:10:22.940 --> 00:10:27.820
Um the one I worked in in Colorado, the the work team there was housed off-site.
00:10:27.899 --> 00:10:30.059
It was not housed within a police agency.
00:10:30.220 --> 00:10:36.299
Uh the that the leap the uh director of the program was actually a civilian position, which was unique for me.
00:10:36.379 --> 00:10:38.139
I'd never experienced that before.
00:10:38.379 --> 00:10:52.460
But um they had a lot of funding from VAWA, uh the Violence Against Women Act to pay for all of this uh the over time and the the building that we were in, and electric bill and all of that, which was great.
00:10:53.340 --> 00:10:55.179
Um, and the team was very effective.
00:10:55.259 --> 00:11:01.500
It was part of the money that the funding they had paid for, a study that was done to show that it reduced recidivism.
00:11:01.820 --> 00:11:06.059
Uh and but it doesn't exist anymore because the funding went away.
00:11:06.220 --> 00:11:08.620
And I I see that as a theme across the United States.
00:11:08.700 --> 00:11:12.779
It's hard to find specialized teams that just focus on domestic violence.
00:11:13.100 --> 00:11:15.899
They are there are some and there's some really effective ones.
00:11:16.059 --> 00:11:24.379
Um but what I what I tell officers is all of those people that make up those teams, they're still in our community.
00:11:24.700 --> 00:11:41.580
Um we may not have be all able to all work out of the same office, but we if we know who we are, for example, from a from a law enforcement perspective, if I identify a prosecutor who I know is passionate about these cases, I'm gonna do my best to make sure they get all my cases.
00:11:41.740 --> 00:11:50.139
And um go if I know if I know a victim advocate who's really passionate about it as well, hopefully they all are, and we're gonna reach out to them.
00:11:50.299 --> 00:12:00.940
Uh we're gonna have maybe have informal meetings and kind of be the squeaky wheel on these cases and making sure that they don't get lost in the system.
00:12:01.659 --> 00:12:03.019
And it's a problem.
00:12:03.100 --> 00:12:10.220
Uh we we see here uh the successful conviction on domestic violence cases in my state, it's abysmal.
00:12:10.779 --> 00:12:12.700
It's less than 10 percent.
00:12:13.019 --> 00:12:16.299
And it's you know, it's it's distressing.
00:12:16.460 --> 00:12:23.100
And we we tend if we're not in a if we're not all working together in a multidisciplinary approach, we there's a lot of finger pointing.
00:12:23.259 --> 00:12:38.700
You know, officers are pointing their fingers at the prosecutors, well, you dismiss the cases left and right, and the prosecutors are saying, well, you're not doing thorough investigations, you're not doing evidence-based investigations, and uh we can't move forward, uh, we can't find the victim, the victim's uncooperative.
00:12:38.860 --> 00:12:47.019
There's a there's all these uh gaps, and having a uh a team can really mitigate those.
00:12:47.340 --> 00:12:49.580
But it's it does take a lot of work.
00:12:50.220 --> 00:12:59.659
Well yeah, I imagine a victim is less likely to be found or be cooperative if they don't have faith in the system that they're actually there to advocate for them.
00:12:59.899 --> 00:13:13.500
So it's almost even if you got a team together, and then even if it disintegrated over time, you're still opening those lines of communication with each other, like how you mentioned you can con you know what prosecutor to look for.
00:13:13.980 --> 00:13:32.299
There's a big disconnect you and I had been talking about previously in education for the providers throughout like all the different um specialties and positions of receiving the education on domestic violence and actually putting it into practice.
00:13:32.539 --> 00:13:58.379
And you know, I'm a nurse practitioner, I'm not really in the hospital anymore to, and I I was never somebody who dealt directly with domestic violence victims, but we always had to have annual competencies just in case we did happen to come upon somebody who uh we would suspect domestic violence, but I can say that I probably was not um prepared enough to actually really pick up on those.
00:13:59.100 --> 00:14:00.460
Yeah, that's a good point.
00:14:00.539 --> 00:14:13.820
Um if I look at education on non-fatal strangulation as an example, um nurses typically don't get that training in nursing school, and doctors aren't getting it in medical school.
00:14:14.059 --> 00:14:27.179
So it's it's tough for if you have a detective or patrol officer who's working a strangulation case to come to a doctor in the emergency room and say, hey, uh this is what I learned.
00:14:27.259 --> 00:14:29.500
Uh we really need a CT scan on this.
00:14:29.740 --> 00:14:31.259
And doctors are like, What?
00:14:31.500 --> 00:14:32.940
You're trying to tell me how to do my job.
00:14:33.019 --> 00:14:35.580
And you're like, no, I so we have we have tools for them.
00:14:35.659 --> 00:14:44.620
We have uh we have some trifold cards that we educate officers, hey, this is something you can give to a physician and say, look, this is the gold standard.
00:14:44.700 --> 00:14:46.379
Uh not not my idea.
00:14:46.460 --> 00:14:53.100
This is other medical professionals who've decided this is the best way to uh give thorough exams on those kinds of cases.
00:14:53.419 --> 00:14:54.940
That can be really helpful.
00:14:55.100 --> 00:15:05.820
And so educating, bringing those people into the fold in your C in your uh response teams is essential uh to make sure they all understand.
00:15:05.980 --> 00:15:07.899
Paramedics is another example.
00:15:07.980 --> 00:15:10.220
Um they're great resources.
00:15:10.379 --> 00:15:16.059
Victims will tell paramedics things that they're not ever gonna say to the police, but paramedics write reports.
00:15:16.299 --> 00:15:21.899
But if they don't understand the signs and symptoms of strangulation, uh they may not ask the right questions.
00:15:21.980 --> 00:15:24.299
And often victims aren't volunteering that.
00:15:24.539 --> 00:15:25.980
You gotta you gotta ask.
00:15:26.539 --> 00:15:26.700
Right.
00:15:26.860 --> 00:15:36.940
And so let's talk about non-fatal strangulation for a second because those individuals don't you can't necessarily tell somebody's been strangled just based on the outward appearance.
00:15:37.659 --> 00:15:38.139
Right.
00:15:38.379 --> 00:15:44.860
Yeah, so we know about what about half the time you're gonna you're gonna have visible bruising.
00:15:45.100 --> 00:15:54.139
And only about 15% of the time are you gonna see bruises that are significant enough to get decent photographs that might be able to use as evidence.
00:15:54.299 --> 00:15:59.100
Uh so we we the absolute and and so at half the time you're not gonna see anything.
00:15:59.419 --> 00:16:01.740
So we've got to ask the right questions.
00:16:01.899 --> 00:16:06.059
We gotta we've got to know uh you know, are you having difficulty breathing?
00:16:06.139 --> 00:16:15.980
Uh is this person have a raspy voice, if they've got uh petichee in the eyes, blood bloodshot eyes, uh are they uh lightheaded?
00:16:17.100 --> 00:16:22.779
They know if they've lost consciousness or not, all of things which can really uh exacerbate the the situation.
00:16:23.100 --> 00:16:32.779
Uh but we've got to identify those those uh markers of strangulation, and it it takes it takes training and it takes time to ask those questions.
00:16:32.940 --> 00:16:40.299
There's some really good assessment tools for law enforcement and for medical providers on reminding us what questions to ask.
00:16:40.620 --> 00:16:47.019
Uh we it's it's one of the crimes that we really want to know, not just strangulation, but domestic violence in general.
00:16:47.419 --> 00:16:50.779
Asking victims, how did this make you feel?
00:16:51.740 --> 00:16:57.659
Because often in a strangulation case, a victim's gonna say, I thought I was gonna die.
00:16:59.259 --> 00:17:02.220
We don't have to do that when we go to burglary calls.
00:17:02.379 --> 00:17:08.299
People are telling us, I'm angry, I'm upset, someone broke into my house, I stole my stuff, I want you to put them in prison.
00:17:08.380 --> 00:17:11.740
Um, but on domestic violence, that's generally not the case.
00:17:12.059 --> 00:17:16.220
So asking people how how they feel is imperative.
00:17:17.820 --> 00:17:28.380
It's really also important to identify those victims because I I believe the risk of lethality following a non fatal strangulation is extremely elevated.
00:17:28.460 --> 00:17:32.619
I um I again I can't remember the statistics right off the top of my 750%.
00:17:33.019 --> 00:17:38.460
Okay, I thought it was 750% greater likelihood you're gonna later be murdered by that person.
00:17:38.619 --> 00:17:40.700
And that doesn't mean you're gonna be strangled in death.
00:17:40.940 --> 00:17:42.940
It can happen in a plethora of other ways.
00:17:43.019 --> 00:17:49.819
Uh it's just people who use strangulation as a form of power and control are much more likely to kill you.
00:17:50.380 --> 00:17:50.940
Right.
00:17:51.259 --> 00:18:06.619
Uh so one thing that keeps coming up that I I everything I keep reading is trauma-informed uh individuals, that you want a trauma-informed attorney, trauma-informed judge, trauma-informed law enforcement to really understand what you're going through.
00:18:06.779 --> 00:18:09.099
What is ex what does that exactly mean?
00:18:09.660 --> 00:18:22.700
Um I I guess one way to characterize it is um you've got to be, you've got to have there there are specialized training programs specifically for trauma-informed interviewing, and they're they're somewhat lengthy.
00:18:22.859 --> 00:18:28.859
And it uh it's probably maybe I'm being a bit optimistic to think that every officer would get a chance to go through those.
00:18:29.019 --> 00:18:30.539
That would be wonderful if they did.
00:18:30.779 --> 00:18:46.539
But there's some basic things that we can all do as far as taking time to understand that trauma affects people's memories, it affects their responses to questions and to different different stimuli that you may be experiencing.
00:18:46.700 --> 00:18:48.700
And domestic violence is one of those.
00:18:48.779 --> 00:18:58.220
Uh, if you look at uh non-fatal strangulation as an example, uh it's if you've been strangled to unconsciousness, you're gonna have gaps in your memory.
00:18:58.380 --> 00:19:01.180
Uh, there's no no way that you're you once you're out, you're out.
00:19:01.259 --> 00:19:02.460
You don't know what happened.
00:19:02.700 --> 00:19:12.700
Um so understanding that and understanding even if you didn't lose consciousness, that you're still going to you may suffer from memory loss, even long-term memory loss.
00:19:13.099 --> 00:19:22.460
And and understanding that victims who have experienced a significant trauma are not necessarily going to be your best uh victim.
00:19:22.779 --> 00:19:32.299
Uh they may not tell you the story in a chronological fashion, which police officers that's over trained over and over again.
00:19:32.460 --> 00:19:34.059
Everything's got to be chronological.
00:19:34.220 --> 00:19:39.660
And sometimes we try to push people into a box and make them tell their story in such a fashion.
00:19:39.900 --> 00:19:41.740
It's not it's not practical.
00:19:41.900 --> 00:19:48.619
It's it's going to ruin your your interview, it's gonna probably ruin your rapport with that victim if you're trying to do that.
00:19:48.779 --> 00:19:53.660
So what I what I tell officers is look, we all have body cameras.
00:19:53.980 --> 00:19:55.180
Most all of us do.
00:19:55.339 --> 00:19:58.140
Um if you don't, you've got some other kind of recording device.
00:19:58.460 --> 00:20:04.940
You're you can go back and refer to those recordings if need be, but let people tell their story without interrupting them.
00:20:05.180 --> 00:20:08.700
Let them talk tell you whatever is on their mind at that moment.
00:20:08.779 --> 00:20:21.500
And it may not be the strangulation, it might be uh they're upset about they need their car keys back, or what where did he take the kids, or how am I gonna pay for this?
00:20:21.740 --> 00:20:24.140
And um who knows?
00:20:24.299 --> 00:20:36.619
There uh I give you an example of a case I worked years ago where um the district attorney's office gave me a call and said, Hey, we we had a victim of uh domestic violence come in.
00:20:36.779 --> 00:20:43.980
She was upset because her case wasn't being prosecuted, and so we looked at the police report and we listened to what she had to say, and they don't match.
00:20:44.140 --> 00:20:46.539
There's lots of information that's not in the report.
00:20:46.700 --> 00:20:48.140
Could you please take a look at this?
00:20:48.380 --> 00:21:04.299
So I did, and it was a it was a report generated by my agency, and the sat down with the victim and went back uh to the beginning, and and what I realized was that um she had been strangled and nobody asked her about that.
00:21:04.619 --> 00:21:09.339
She didn't she didn't share that information with deputies on scene.
00:21:09.500 --> 00:21:14.539
She did briefly mention it to the paramedics, she never mentioned it to the doctor at the emergency room.
00:21:14.859 --> 00:21:20.140
And there was a witness to that strangulation who was never interviewed, her teenage daughter.
00:21:20.380 --> 00:21:31.660
Because when she's telling me this story, she's saying, Well, I came in and you know, he he put his arm around my throat and he was punching me and I lost consciousness, and then he drugged me across the floor and he pushed me out the back door.
00:21:31.819 --> 00:21:34.380
I think, well, how do you know all this stuff if you were unconscious?
00:21:34.619 --> 00:21:38.859
And so, oh, my daughter told me that's what happened after I lost consciousness.
00:21:38.940 --> 00:21:41.180
Well, she wasn't mentioned anywhere in the report.
00:21:41.500 --> 00:21:47.980
So we've got to interview all the witnesses because we never know what people saw or heard.
00:21:48.220 --> 00:21:55.339
And it's just an example where the paramedics she mentioned being choked, it was a term she'd used to the paramedics.
00:21:55.500 --> 00:21:59.180
They didn't they didn't pass it on to them to the doctor.
00:21:59.500 --> 00:22:28.299
Um, so what what I tell investigators is look, if at all possible, go to the ER with your victim, make sure that the that the ER physician knows that the strangulation occurred and encourage them to do a thorough exam, look for those signs and symptoms, or ask about the signs and symptoms and look for internal injuries because they they very well may be there, and you're not gonna be able to doctors can't see them either without specialized equipment, specialized tests.
00:22:28.619 --> 00:22:42.380
Um but the the back to the trauma-informed interviewing, um just not asking compound questions, keeping them simple and straightforward, letting victims tell their story all the way through without interrupting.
00:22:42.460 --> 00:22:45.500
And you can always go back and walk them through step by step.
00:22:46.940 --> 00:23:08.779
So you actually brought up something that uh I wanted to point out is a lot of times when people think of strangulation, they think of someone coming from the front of them using their hands to actually put around their neck and maybe don't even consider the arm, the I guess the sleeper holds sort of um as that is actually a form of strangulation as well.
00:23:09.259 --> 00:23:09.500
Sure.
00:23:09.660 --> 00:23:15.099
And you can uh uh ligatures are a form of strangulation, hanging is a form of strangulation.
00:23:15.420 --> 00:23:23.660
So you can use other your your arms, your knees, your legs, all kinds of things that anything you can compress someone's throat with.
00:23:23.819 --> 00:23:29.579
And and it's important to understand it doesn't it can be your fingers, it doesn't take much pressure at all.
00:23:29.819 --> 00:23:37.019
Actually, only about four and a half to five pounds of pressure to cut off the blood flow to some to a human being.
00:23:37.180 --> 00:23:43.660
And to put that in perspective, if you can open the soda can with your finger, you have enough strength to strangle someone.
00:23:43.980 --> 00:23:48.380
If you can pull the trigger on a pistol, uh you have enough strength to strangle somebody.
00:23:49.660 --> 00:24:07.180
So I mean, I know a victim's not necessarily going to be thinking of what terms to use if they're speaking to officers, but is there any are there any key words or key terms that somebody would use that would kind of raise the the red flag for an officer who's you know answering a domestic call?
00:24:08.059 --> 00:24:09.180
About strangulation?
00:24:09.660 --> 00:24:30.299
About anything that's Oh um Well looking for I think looking for signs that someone is in fear, uh looking at and but that may that can be those can be subtle clues and not not making the assumption that everyone's gonna be upset or crying or angry.
00:24:30.380 --> 00:24:35.740
Uh some some victims are gonna be appear completely calm, completely controlled.
00:24:35.980 --> 00:24:42.619
And that may be because they're they're basically immune to the process, and it's a regular occurrence for them.
00:24:42.779 --> 00:24:46.619
Um but we're all humans, we all respond differently to trauma.
00:24:46.940 --> 00:24:54.220
So we can't assume that uh I've seen officers who have well, she wasn't upset, she wasn't crying.
00:24:54.299 --> 00:24:58.859
I don't know, maybe maybe she's not being truthful, and that could be the complete opposite.
00:24:58.940 --> 00:25:00.460
So you gotta be open.
00:25:00.779 --> 00:25:22.059
Um trying to think of some other examples, but separating victims and suspects is imperative to doing thorough investigations when you know, but oftentimes these scenes are very chaotic, so you have to get things under control before you can be very effective.
00:25:22.700 --> 00:25:25.180
You gotta be you gotta have at least two officers respond.
00:25:25.339 --> 00:25:40.460
One officer is not gonna be able to do a very thorough interview because you need to separate your your people that are involved visually, also auditorily, um, but you gotta keep your partner in sight because officers have to remain safe.
00:25:40.619 --> 00:25:42.539
It's it can be quite complex.
00:25:42.940 --> 00:25:51.180
Um but so giving people a space where they feel safe enough to tell you what's going on is is imperative.
00:25:51.740 --> 00:26:07.420
Um I think and and and making sure that as I said before, all your witnesses are interviewed, and that includes children, but I'm not advocating that officers interview kids on the scene, especially younger children.
00:26:07.579 --> 00:26:10.779
Uh, that takes a specialized uh form of training.
00:26:10.940 --> 00:26:25.740
It needs to be a forensic interview, and that's where that multidisciplinary team comes into into focus, because you you're gonna have to get those kids to um uh children's advocacy center where those those interviews can be done in a safe environment.
00:26:25.900 --> 00:26:39.420
And if you start interviewing kids and locking them in on a story, uh you never know that the kids are are are very likely to want to protect one parent or the other, or maybe both, or maybe they're telling you what they think you want to hear.
00:26:39.500 --> 00:26:48.299
Uh, and if you don't have specialized training on how to ask non-meaning questions of children, you can really uh devastate a case.
00:26:48.619 --> 00:26:53.019
So get them to to uh forensic interview.
00:26:53.579 --> 00:27:04.140
That's uh actually a very good point, too, because they they can be swayed easily or remember things incorrectly if they're led uh down wrong questioning.
00:27:04.380 --> 00:27:18.140
Um one point I want to take um make is that it's it is difficult sometimes to find out who the victim versus the perpetrator is, because uh the victim can typically present as the crazy one, more emotional.
00:27:18.299 --> 00:27:22.140
And then the perpetrator can be calm and charming.
00:27:22.220 --> 00:27:35.180
And I think a very good case that a lot of us uh non-professionals were able to watch if we watched that documentary was the Gabby Petito case when um the police officers had pulled her over or pulled them over.
00:27:35.500 --> 00:27:35.819
Right.
00:27:36.059 --> 00:27:38.859
Yeah, that's a that's kind of a classic example.
00:27:39.019 --> 00:27:43.099
Um they you know, I watched most of that.
00:27:43.420 --> 00:28:05.500
Uh and it's one one thing I think one tool that we use in my agency, which I think would have all agencies ought to use, is some for some form of a lethality assessment tool, a risk assessment or danger assessment tool, where you ask a series of questions that you know positive answers to are going to raise red flags on a lethality.
00:28:05.740 --> 00:28:16.700
And I I guess well, we're never gonna know in the Gavin Petito case for sure, but if someone had asked her, have you ever been strangled or ever had something put around your throat?
00:28:16.859 --> 00:28:23.019
Uh if she had answered yes, they could have changed the whole idea of the combat investigation.
00:28:23.099 --> 00:28:27.579
Because ultimately that's what her death was ruled, homicide by strangulation.
00:28:28.220 --> 00:28:32.460
Um there was no lethality system tool done that I saw.
00:28:32.539 --> 00:28:36.460
Uh and there are lots of agencies in the country that don't have one.
00:28:36.619 --> 00:28:40.619
Uh so that that's something I would strongly advocate for.
00:28:41.740 --> 00:28:43.980
And that's something that I think is pretty easy to find.
00:28:44.059 --> 00:29:03.099
I remember I did a an episode where I did discuss a lethality tool, and I did a simple Google and I was able to find basic questions, not necessarily affiliated with a specific place, but I think it was the person who had designed the initial lethality assessment tool that I grabbed a few questions from.
00:29:03.579 --> 00:29:03.900
Right.
00:29:04.140 --> 00:29:04.619
Uh Dr.
00:29:04.700 --> 00:29:08.859
Jacqueline Campbell is one of the premier researchers in this area.
00:29:08.940 --> 00:29:14.539
And there's a couple of different danger assessments out there that she was interval in creating.
00:29:14.700 --> 00:29:20.619
The one we use, uh the Maryland model, uh assessment program, is the one we use.
00:29:20.779 --> 00:29:26.299
And I'm not advocating for anyone in particular, but that it's it's easy, it's straightforward.
00:29:26.380 --> 00:29:30.220
It reminds officers the questions that we ought to be asking in all of these cases anyway.
00:29:30.380 --> 00:29:33.579
Uh, for example, as have you ever been choked or strangled?